Interesting that yet another article questions Israel's reports that Hamas killed IDF forces but does not question Hamas' report and somehow expects Israel to accept breaches to the ceasefire with no response. Is it possible that both "sides" have some reasonable skepticism of the other? Is it possible that neither can be trusted for neutral reporting?
Yet another lie. Who/what is your source for that accusation? Further, is it possible that the "journalists" that may be your source are not real journalists and are propagandists? I fully understand that it's really hard to know what sources are reliable, regardless of bias. No one seems to follow the kind of journalistic standards I studied in the 1970's.
Interesting that yet another article questions Israel's reports that Hamas killed IDF forces but does not question Hamas' report and somehow expects Israel to accept breaches to the ceasefire with no response. Is it possible that both "sides" have some reasonable skepticism of the other? Is it possible that neither can be trusted for neutral reporting?
How does one get reporting out of Gaza when Israel murders all the reporters?
Yet another lie. Who/what is your source for that accusation? Further, is it possible that the "journalists" that may be your source are not real journalists and are propagandists? I fully understand that it's really hard to know what sources are reliable, regardless of bias. No one seems to follow the kind of journalistic standards I studied in the 1970's.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/oct/03/gaza-conflict-killing-journalists-has-become-journalism-graveyard
Israel murders anybody who tries to report on their actions in Gaza.
Slanted reporting…. Unfollowing.
Triggered much??